Two big hits in a world that seems to hang on big numbers:
- 4 million new model iphones sold by Apple over its launch weekend.
- 7 billion people expected to be sharing this planet on October 31st.
Ok, so the phones aren’t really a big deal but think about this. The new iphone has only launched in 6 so-called advanced nations and is set to be available in 70 more countries by the end of the year. As per the bombastic game of being the greatest, latest, best thing since sliced bread that we all play in product launch world, records tumble, bought media swoon, etc.
Will this new person be a future iphone owner?
And when we add that a soft landing for export-roided (or should that be synthol-ed) China is described as ‘mission impossible’ by Nouriel Roubini – on account of overinvestment and all the rest, our greatest hopes quickly morph into our greatest fears :
Even Beijing is in a tizz about #OWS
Well the answer to that is of course that the first rule about fight club is … Apart from this time round that rule has been holed below the waterline. Because now its not just(!) about the planet, the world’s voiceless, the climate refugees and the rest of the have nots that weren’t factored into the strategies of the Fortune 500 during our last prosperity bump. Prosperity, or the dream of prosperity, has melted away for most and people are prepared to do what they can to force change through. See Occupy Wall Street. See the indignados across Europe, hunger strikes in India, student protests in Chile and much more. This a global connective movement, dubbed by Umair Haque as the meta-movement, where even Beijing is in a tizz about #OWS.
So maybe Apple should think about doing something about it. Maybe it isn’t powerless. Maybe the world’s 7 billionth person wont own an iphone but he or she may end up connecting with Apple at some point in their life ( and not in a Foxconn kind of way) in a way that isn’t about being part of a global product launch.
Wants and needs are blurring
I’m not suggesting that Apple becomes UNICEF (though i do think they should never sell another new phone). But what i am gently getting at is that perhaps things are not the way they used to be. Wants and needs are blurring, changing with an expanding, ever more global population, with the death throes of a defunct Western model, with life giving resources becoming more scarce and with us more interconnected than ever before (see Bratislava sneezing, New York catching a cold…or sthg)
So in this new blurred zone, churning out units and sitting on billions probably will break records, but probably not for that long. The real advantage is in thinking about what these new wants/needs are and realigning yourself with them. Perhaps we should stop gaming the system, pull our heads out of the sand and maybe talk about fight club in the fora where it doesn’t usually get talked about.
It might just be that these firms that are making the headlines at the beginning of the third millennium are simply living off the fumes of the last one. What we need are new ideas (they might be firms but don’t have to be) whose power source is an altogether different brew; an undiscovered reserve that is now fighting its way to the surface (no, not fracked gas). The question is: do we have the ability, wit and foresight to tap into it before it is too late?
A mini plug. Next week @ 6pm October 27th I’m running a little session with Ed Gillespie (@frucool) at the Hub Westminster Changemaker Fayre titled: Design a high street as if the world mattered. Do come on down will be fun and we could use you help!



